[R] Code modification for post-hoc power

Michael Dewey ||@t@ @end|ng |rom dewey@myzen@co@uk
Tue Aug 27 13:25:33 CEST 2019


Dear Anne

Can you resend the eror message which you accidentally sent only to me 
please?

Michael

On 27/08/2019 08:02, CHATTON Anne wrote:
> Dear Michael,
> 
> Thanks a lot for your suggestion. This is what I am trying to do with R (longpower and gee packages). But I am getting stuck with a confusing error message sent earlier I don't understand.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Anne
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Michael Dewey [mailto:lists using dewey.myzen.co.uk]
> Envoyé : lundi, 26 août 2019 18:29
> À : Marc Schwartz <marc_schwartz using me.com>; CHATTON Anne <Anne.Chatton using hcuge.ch>
> Cc : R-help <r-help using r-project.org>
> Objet : Re: [R] Code modification for post-hoc power
> 
> Dear Anne
> 
> In addition to Marc's comments if you are forced to do this then, assuming your package computes sample size from power then just feed it a range of powers and find the one for which it calculates the sample size you had. There is a more elegant way to do this using uniroot but brute force should work.
> 
> Michael
> 
> On 26/08/2019 13:42, Marc Schwartz via R-help wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 26, 2019, at 6:24 AM, CHATTON Anne via R-help <r-help using r-project.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> I am trying to accommodate the R codes provided by Donohue for sample size calculation in the package "longpower" with lmmpower function to estimate the post-hoc power (asked by a reviewer) of a binary GEE model with a three-way interaction (time x condition x continuous predictor) given a fixed sample size. In other words instead of the sample size I would like to estimate the power of my study.
>>>
>>> Could anyone please help me to modify these codes as to obtain the power I'm looking for.
>>>
>>> I would really appreciate receiving any feedback on this subject.
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>> Anne
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Three comments:
>>
>> 1. Don't calculate post hoc power. Do a Google search and you will find a plethora of papers and discussions on why not, including these:
>>
>>     The Abuse of Power: The Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis
>>     The American Statistician, February 2001, Vol. 55, No. 1
>>     https://www.vims.edu/people/hoenig_jm/pubs/hoenig2.pdf
>>
>>     Post Hoc Power: Tables and Commentary
>>     https://stat.uiowa.edu/sites/stat.uiowa.edu/files/techrep/tr378.pdf
>>
>>     Observed power, and what to do if your editor asks for post-hoc power analyses
>>     
>> http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2014/12/observed-power-and-what-to-do
>> -if-your.html
>>
>>     Retraction Watch:
>>     Statisticians clamor for retraction of paper by Harvard researchers they say uses a “nonsense statistic”
>>     
>> https://retractionwatch.com/2019/06/19/statisticians-clamor-for-retrac
>> tion-of-paper-by-harvard-researchers-they-say-uses-a-nonsense-statisti
>> c/
>>
>>     PubPeer Comments on the paper cited in the above RW post:
>>     https://pubpeer.com/publications/4399282A80691D9421B497E8316CF6
>>
>>     A discussion on Frank's Data Methods forum also related to the same paper cited above:
>>     "Observed Power" and other "Power" Issues
>>     
>> https://discourse.datamethods.org/t/observed-power-and-other-power-iss
>> ues/731/30
>>
>>
>> 2. If you are still compelled (voluntarily or involuntarily), you may want to review the vignette for the longpower package which may have some insights, and/or contact the package maintainer for additional guidance on how to structure the code. See the vignette here:
>>
>>     
>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/longpower/vignettes/longpower.
>> pdf
>>
>>
>> 3. Don't calculate post hoc power.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Marc Schwartz
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help using r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>> https://www.avg.com
>>
>>
> 
> --
> Michael
> http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html
> 

-- 
Michael
http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html



More information about the R-help mailing list