[Rd] Package vignettes share the same environment?
murdoch.duncan at gmail.com
Sat Apr 5 22:04:53 CEST 2014
On 05/04/2014, 2:24 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
> In a package 'vig' R CMD build vig (or tools::buildVignettes(dir="vig") with
> $ cat vig/vignettes/vig1.Rnw
> x <- 1
> $ cat vig/vignettes/vig2.Rnw
> produces vig2.pdf where x is defined with value 1 -- the vignettes share a build
> environment. This seems undesirable in terms of reproducibility (a reader of
> vig2.pdf will not understand where x is assigned; similarly for the results of
> require() or data() in vig1 referenced in vig2), and is not (?) documented. A
> more elaborate context is
> Would it be better to build each vignette in its own environment?
It's not just the environment that gets shared: if you run
buildVignette or buildVignettes in an R session, other aspects of the
session (e.g. options() settings) will also be inherited by the
vignette. The way "R CMD build" handles this is to start a new R
process to build the vignettes.
Currently it builds all vignettes in one process, rather than starting a
separate process for each, which is why you see the x variable carry
from one vignette to another. I think it has been like this for quite a
while, because on some platforms (e.g. Windows), starting a new process
is quite slow.
I don't know if any other packages than gage currently depend on this
behaviour. It does sound confusing for the reader, but I don't think it
breaks reproducibility: after all, if a user has the package, they have
all the vignettes, not just one. If they just have the vignette, then
they might not have the functions in the package that it needs, so
they've already lost reproducibility.
> $ R --version|head -n 3
> R version 3.1.0 RC (2014-04-05 r65379) -- "Spring Dance"
> Copyright (C) 2014 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
> Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
More information about the R-devel