[Rd] Package vignettes share the same environment?
xie at yihui.name
Sun Apr 6 04:37:03 CEST 2014
By "quite slow" start-up time on Windows, you mean on the order of 1
or 2 seconds? That is probably not too bad, when we weigh it against
the confusion from compiling all vignettes in the same R session.
knitr::knit() has an 'envir' argument that specifies the environment
in which the code chunks are executed, but at the moment it is not
easy to pass additional arguments to the vignette engine. Of course,
one way is to define a new vignette engine, and that is not too hard:
it is basically something like knitr::knit(file, envir = new.env()).
But as mentioned below, there are other things shared in the same
session such as options(). I guess the cleanest way is still to start
new R sessions.
Yihui Xie <xieyihui at gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/04/2014, 2:24 PM, Martin Morgan wrote:
>> In a package 'vig' R CMD build vig (or tools::buildVignettes(dir="vig")
>> $ cat vig/vignettes/vig1.Rnw
>> x <- 1
>> $ cat vig/vignettes/vig2.Rnw
>> produces vig2.pdf where x is defined with value 1 -- the vignettes share a
>> environment. This seems undesirable in terms of reproducibility (a reader
>> vig2.pdf will not understand where x is assigned; similarly for the
>> results of
>> require() or data() in vig1 referenced in vig2), and is not (?)
>> documented. A
>> more elaborate context is
>> Would it be better to build each vignette in its own environment?
> It's not just the environment that gets shared: if you run buildVignette or
> buildVignettes in an R session, other aspects of the session (e.g. options()
> settings) will also be inherited by the vignette. The way "R CMD build"
> handles this is to start a new R process to build the vignettes.
> Currently it builds all vignettes in one process, rather than starting a
> separate process for each, which is why you see the x variable carry from
> one vignette to another. I think it has been like this for quite a while,
> because on some platforms (e.g. Windows), starting a new process is quite
> I don't know if any other packages than gage currently depend on this
> behaviour. It does sound confusing for the reader, but I don't think it
> breaks reproducibility: after all, if a user has the package, they have all
> the vignettes, not just one. If they just have the vignette, then they
> might not have the functions in the package that it needs, so they've
> already lost reproducibility.
> Duncan Murdoch
More information about the R-devel