Brian G. Peterson
brian at braverock.com
Wed Jan 18 14:23:39 CET 2017
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 22:46 -0500, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible
> license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is
> indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be
> the primary license recommended by the FSF for software intended for
> the public domain.
I'd second the recommendation for CC0. Lawyers at IP-restrictive firms
I've worked for in the past have been OK with this license.
More information about the R-devel