[Rd] Tiny bug in lm()?

[Brett Presnell]

I meant ncol(y) of course.

Brett Presnell <presnell using ufl.edu> writes:

> I suppose that this never affects anything, but in line 57 of lm.R,
> where the coefficients are defined for an empty model, when y is a
> matrix, shouldn't the value be matrix(,0,nrow(y)) rather than
> matrix(,0,3)?