[Rd] Bundling MathJax

Duncan Murdoch murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Sun Mar 13 17:02:25 CET 2022

On 13/03/2022 11:29 a.m., Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 7:35 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan using gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 13/03/2022 8:47 a.m., Ivan Krylov wrote:
>>> Hello R-devel,
>>> I appreciate the efforts devoted towards improving equation typography
>>> in HTML manuals. Since MathML lost its status as the way to express
>>> mathematics on the web after its removal from Google Chrome in 2013,
>>> MathJax and KaTeX are probably the best options left: both TtH [1] and
>>> HeVeA [2] don't render math quite as well and likely don't do anything
>>> about accessibility of the resulting equations (which seems to be the
>>> reason to focus on the HTML documentation in the first place).
>>> Having seen r81881 [3], I would like to suggest bundling MathJax
>>> together with R instead of loading it from the Internet. Every now and
>>> then, I work from places with spotty Internet connection (e.g. mobile
>>> network on a train). If R defaults to downloading a file every time
>>> Rd2HTML is called, that would be very inconvenient to me, especially
>>> since the requests for external JavaScript could intermittently fail
>>> or take a long time to load, resulting in partially failed renders.
>>> For now, R documentation can be viewed without access to external
>>> resources (admittedly, not counting the use of external \figure{} and
>>> other Rd macros by packages, which is rare). I think that's a major
>>> strength of R and I would like to help preserve it.
>> An issue related to this was faced by the mathjaxr package:  The file
>> used for display is usually a minified version of the MathJax source,
>> and Debian didn't consider it close enough to source code to want to
>> distribute it as FOSS.  So if the minified file is included with R, the
>> original source should also be included.
>> An alternative to this would be to provide a utility to download the
>> minified file.  Users with poor connectivity could do that once and
>> access the local copy thereafter.
> Would this really work? Wouldn't you also need the supplementary files
> such as fonts (relative to the main js file)?

Sorry, my memory was bad.  It wasn't just one minified file, it was 
multiple minified files.  You can see what was included before the 
Debian complaint here:


Your suggestion of optionally using an installed copy of the mathjaxr 
package seems ideal.

Duncan Murdoch

More information about the R-devel mailing list