[R] Is this a bug of pweibull()? (Follow up)
Lu Chi-Hsien Joseph
cjlu at ibm.stat.ncku.edu.tw
Sun May 12 11:15:06 CEST 2002
Please allow me to add just a little more about this:
nothing wrong with pweibull(), namely, the two cases I reported:
pweibull(3:10, 2) and pweibull(3:10, 2.1),
in rw1041 and earlier version.
I wonder this might just due to the change from rw1041 to rw1050,
however, I can't find anything relevant (seems to me) in the News
Thanks Sundar for the suggestion of using 1 - pweibull(..., lower.tail=TRUE),
but I think I rather stay with rw1041 and wait for correction comming since
it would be a not-so-worth effort for me to modify many functions I wrote
at this moment.
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
More information about the R-help