[R] A new <expletive deleted>-up?

Santosh santosh2005 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 19 19:20:15 CEST 2017


otherwise explain it as unexplained "random variable"/ "residual error" :)

Santosh

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Rolf Turner <r.turner at auckland.ac.nz>
wrote:

>
> On 19/04/17 20:01, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> I believe that the list maintainer is hunting this down. As I
>> understood it, it was more due to incompetence than to actual malice.
>>
>
> Years ago I ran across an aphorism that very much appealed to me: "Never
> attribute to malice that which may be adequately explained by stupidity."
>
> More recently I saw the same sentiment, expressed only slightly
> differently, in someone's signature file --- can't remember whose.
>
> cheers,
>
> Rolf
>
>
> --
> Technical Editor ANZJS
> Department of Statistics
> University of Auckland
> Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posti
> ng-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-help mailing list